In the part 1 of the series, AsyncPhoto for displaying large photos in SwiftUI, we built a SwiftUI view which has a similar interface to Apple’s AsyncImage, but provides a way to use any kind of image data source. In the part 2 of the series, we’ll implement an in-memory cache for the AsyncPhoto. This is important for reducing any flickering caused by the nature of async image loading. An example to highlight where it comes useful is when we have a detail view which displays a thumbnail of a large photo. If we open the detail view multiple times for the same photo, we really do not want to see the loading spinner every single time. Another benefit is that we do not need to load a huge photo in memory and then spending CPU on scaling it down.
OK, let’s jump into it.
The aim of the cache is to cache the scaled down images. We never want to cache the original image data since it would make the memory usage to through the roof, and we would still need to use CPU to scale down the image. Before we start, we need to remember that in part 1 we designed the AsyncPhoto in a way where it has an ID, scaledSize properties and a closure for returning image data asynchronously. Therefore, the caching key needs to be created by using the ID and the scaled size, since we might want to display a photo in multiple AsyncPhoto instances with different sizes. Let’s create an interface for the caching layer. We’ll go for a protocol based approach, which allows replacing the caching logic with different concrete implementations. In this blog post we’ll go for a NSCache backed caching implementation, but anyone else could use other approaches as well, like LRUCache.
The protocol only defines 3 functions for writing, reading, and creating a caching key. We’ll provide a default implementation for the cacheKey(for:size:) function. Since the same image data should be cached by size, the cache key combines id and size arguments. Since we are dealing with floats in a string, we’ll round the width and height.
The next step is to create a concrete implementation. In this blog post, we’ll go for NSCache which automatically evicts images from the cache in case of a memory pressure. The downside of a NSCache is that the logic in which order images are evicted is not defined. The implementation is straight-forward.
We also added a shared instance since we want to use a single cache instance for all the AsyncPhoto instances. Let’s see how the AsyncPhoto implementation changes when we add a caching layer. The answer is, not so much.
We added a new cache argument but also set the default value to the shared instance. The load() function tries to read a cached image as a first step, and the preparedScaledImage(for:) updates the cache. We rely on the cache implementation to keep the cache size small, therefore here is no code for manually evicting images from the cache when the ID changes. The main reason is that the AsyncPhoto instance does not have enough context for deciding this. For example, there might be other instances showing the photo for the old ID or maybe a moment later we want to display the photo for the old ID.
To recap, what we did. We defined an interface for caching images, created a NSCache based in-memory cache and hooked it up to the AsyncPhoto. We did all of this in a way that we did not need to change any existing code using AsyncPhoto instances.
There were some other tiny improvements, like using Task.isCancelled() to more quickly react to the ID change, setting the default placeholder colour to a light gray, and providing a default implementation for the content closure. Please check the example project for the full implementation. Here is the example project which reloads an avatar and as we can see at first, spinner is shown, but when images are cached, the change is immediate.
SwiftUIAsyncPhotoExample2 (GitHub, Xcode 15.1)
If this was helpful, please let me know on Mastodon@toomasvahter or Twitter @toomasvahter. Feel free to subscribe to RSS feed. Thank you for reading.
Augmented Code 